In the case of geologically lost lodes, the miners come to the abrupt end of a vein and can't find the "lost" piece on the other side of a fault because dip-slip faulting moves things in unexpected directions.
Every time I have to figure out where to drill a test hole in that circumstance I have to get out the structural geology text, and cookbook the solution or more usually the solutions, to where that offset piece might have ended up. Given that ore deposits are geologic abnormalities themselves, and that they usually occur where the geology gets difficult to begin with, there is always more than one possibility.
In the Leadville District there are structural zones where all three of these types of motion have occurred. The often considerable expense involved to solve the puzzle of finding mineral deposits under such circumstances, especially before the invention of core drilling, was driven by the economics of high grade silver. Just because the most recent motion on a particular zone of weakness was "normal," doesn't mean that the first breakage, or the next one to come, will have the same type of relative displacement. When a rift turns into an arch, all the normal faults become reverse faults, or even thrusts when the center is pushed up. This is the case along a twenty plus mile stretch of the Little Belt Mountains in Montana, and may be the situation in the Howard and Coaldale areas.
Figure 5 is a thrust fault, defined by horizontal displacement of the rocks on one side over the rocks on the other. The example shown is a fold that kept on going until the rocks on one side of the axis broke, which allowed the subsequent displacement to happen. I can't think of an example of an earthquake that was caused by motion on a thrust fault. However in central Nevada there are large parts of what was formerly Utah that slid over their western neighbor, and I have a difficult time visualizing that happening without some very significant earthquakes occurring, too.