Lesser of two weevils in the 2006 election
Letter from Slim Wolfe
Politics - January 2007 - Colorado Central Magazine - No. 155 - Page 36
Copyright © 2007 by Slim Wolfe and Central Colorado Publishing Co. All rights reserved.
Return to January 2007 table of contents.
Editors:
Lessers of two election weevils: Why not earmark some of that animal
shelter funding for a birth control campaign? Why levy the entire
county for the negligence of a few animal owners, unless we're in line
with conservatives whose notion of acceptable contraception seems to be
a fourteen-year-old male?
Why not legalize a pound or two of marijuana? Martha thinks the
stuff is a waste of time and money, but some folks get a nice lift from
it, and might rather spend their weed dollars locally. Legalization of
an ounce implies approval of an illegal chain of dealers and suppliers
-- since even a single homegrown pot-plant implies more than an ounce.
As long as small-time local cultivation is discouraged, the
alternatives are encouraged.
It was the usual sophomoric campaign, so let me tweak a couple of
locals who happened to get my vote despite it all: Curtis Imrie, you
bought successive back pages of Colorado Central and had plenty
of space to give us a platform over and above buzzwords and a cute
cartoon. Gail Schwartz, you plastered the highways and the airwaves for
name and face recognition, but what kind of electorate votes for a
face? Sure, it was your opponent who started the slurs, but give the
voters credit to see that stuff for what it was, and use your money as
if you had an electorate that deserves to know more. Integrity, vision,
fair play, health care, serves the people, duh. All that tells us is
that if elected you'll do what's politically expedient.